Whitechapel is renowned for its contradictory statements of intent but their strategy for connecting our little island has to take the prize for most ridiculous.
The intention is to enable every home with ‘super-fast broadband’ by 2020 (or 2012 depending on the source). We agree with their plan and their efforts reflect our initiatives in rural Zambia. With over 80% of the world’s population believing that the Internet is a basic human right, we’d be wrong to disagree.
At the same time that Brown announces this, weeks after it’s been publicised (good to know he’s keeping up), they also introduce a clause in their digital economy bill that gives them the power to close websites that infringe copyright. Whilst we at PolkaSpots Supafly Wi-Fi don’t condone illegal downloading, we do not agree that a government should be allowed to control the Internet.
On top of this, their plan to roll this out includes a £6 / year tax on our telephone line rental to help BT finance the deployment… But why should this just be left with BT – they haven’t been a public company for nearly 30 years and what about their competition? It would seem that the UK government is saying that only BT can do this. Why? We live in a free country don’t we?
Personally, I believe we need broadband to stay connected with the world. I can see that if we don’t have access to the Internet that we’ll get left behind. For this reason, we volunteer our time to help deploy Wi-Fi Hotspot Networks in rural Zambia. I don’t however agree that we all need 100Mb broadband – businesses won’t be put off coming to this country if Duncannon (one of the UK’s smallest villages) doesn’t have it.
This might just sound like I don’t want the UK to be connected but you’d be wrong. Let’s get 100mb broadband across the UK – let’s just be a little more open about who’s going to pay and run it. I do not see why BT should own the network. And, if they’re going to – shouldn’t they be a public company again?
Read more on the BBC technology site here.
